Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
103 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume:4 Issue 1 (2019) (Jan-Dec, 2019) | Pages 4 - 8
A Comparative Study of Epidural Versus General Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Abdominal Surgeries
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Amroha, India;
2
Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Amroha, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
March 22, 2019
Revised
April 17, 2019
Accepted
May 25, 2019
Published
June 11, 2019
Abstract

Abstract: Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) in managing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, time to first analgesic requirement, incidence of adverse events, and hospital stay duration in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries.

Materials & Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 100 adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery, with 50 patients each in the EA and GA groups. Epidural anesthesia involved administering 0.5% Bupivacaine at the T10–L2 level, followed by an infusion of 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl (2 μg/mL). General anesthesia included Propofol for induction and Isoflurane with intermittent Fentanyl boluses for maintenance. Postoperative pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, time to first analgesic requirement, adverse events, and length of hospital stay.

Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the EA group at all time intervals (p< 0.001). Total opioid consumption (5.2 ± 1.8 mg vs. 12.4 ± 3.5 mg, p< 0.001) and the number of breakthrough analgesic doses (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8, p< 0.001) were significantly lower in the EA group. Time to first analgesic requirement was longer in the EA group (6.8 ± 1.5 hours vs. 3.2 ± 1.0 hours, p< 0.001). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the EA group (12% vs. 36%, p = 0.003). The EA group also had a shorter hospital stay (4.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 5.8 ± 1.4 days, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Epidural anesthesia demonstrated superior postoperative pain control, reduced opioid consumption, prolonged analgesic duration, fewer adverse events, and shorter hospital stays compared to general anesthesia. These findings highlight the advantages of epidural anesthesia as an effective option for managing postoperative pain in abdominal surgeries.

 

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Effect of Teriparatide on Fracture Healing and Functional Outcomes in Osteoporotic Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study.
...
Published: 19/07/2025
Research Article
Clinical Outcomes Of Intra-Articular Glucosamine-Chondroitin In Early-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Double-Blind Trial
...
Published: 26/07/2025
Research Article
Comparative Efficacy of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomised Study
...
Published: 26/07/2025
Research Article
Age-Dependent changes in Oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with differential severity of Coronary Artery Disease
...
Published: 27/06/2025
© Copyright CPD Bulletin Clinical Biochemistry