Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
31 Views
4 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 10 Issue 1 (2025) (January, 2025) | Pages 21 - 24
Comparison of fasting and non-fasting lipid profile in patients of tertiary health care centre: A pilot study
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Attending consultant, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MEDANTA- The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
2
Senior Consultant and Head, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MEDANTA- The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
3
Senior Manager, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MEDANTA- The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
4
Consultant, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MEDANTA- The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 2, 2025
Revised
Jan. 7, 2025
Accepted
Jan. 11, 2025
Published
Jan. 17, 2025
Abstract

Abstract: Background: To determine serum lipid profiles, fasting blood samples have traditionally been used as the most reliable method. However, fasting can pose significant challenges, particularly for children, and individuals associated with diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and it also serves as a barrier to widespread population screening. Therefore, our study aims to assess the validity of lipid profile results obtained from non-fasting blood samples by comparing them with those derived from fasting blood samples.

Objectives: To evaluate whether there is any change in the measurement of lipid profile in fastingversus non-fasting states

Material and Methods: This study included about 98 patients at Medanta from October to December 2024. Fasting and random blood samples were analyzed for lipid profiles, including serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, and VLDL, in the clinical biochemistry laboratory using Vitros dry chemistry autoanalyzers. Serum values from fasting and Postprandial lipid profiles were obtained, compared, and correlated. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 32, employing paired sample t-tests and Pearson’s correlation. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The comparison of lipid profiles between fasting and non-fasting states revealed a significant difference in triglycerides (TG) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels (p < 0.001). Mean TG and VLDL levels were higher in the non-fasting state (152.84 ± 58.3 mg/dL and 30.56 ± 11.54 mg/dL, respectively) compared to the fasting state (135.04 ± 46.9 mg/dL and 19.63 ± 11.6 mg/dL, respectively).  A significant level of correlation was observed (r > 0.936, p < 0.001) between fasting and non-fasting samples across all lipid parameters.

Conclusion: Our study concludes that non-fasting lipid profiles are better for patient convenience while providing comparable diagnostic and prognostic capabilities for monitoring and treating dyslipidaemias. Further research is needed to establish non-fasting reference intervals in a larger population.

 

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Salivary interleukin-6 levels in oral premalignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma
...
Published: 20/01/2025
Research Article
Acyclovir with Steroid and Steroid Alone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Facial Nerve Palsy
Published: 15/01/2025
Research Article
Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil for controlled hypotension and recovery under general anaesthesia in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
...
Published: 09/01/2025
Research Article
Assessment of balloon dilation laryngoplasty for acquired subglottic stenosis
Published: 15/06/2022
© Copyright CPD Bulletin Clinical Biochemistry