Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
42 Views
0 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume:7 Issue 1 (2022) (Jan-Dec, 2022) | Pages 1 - 5
Comparison of Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Standard Wound Care in Postoperative Healing in Orthopaedic Surgeries
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Krishna Mohan Medical College & Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Krishna Mohan Medical College & Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 17, 2022
Revised
Jan. 30, 2022
Accepted
Feb. 25, 2022
Published
March 22, 2022
Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To compare the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus standard wound care (SWC) in promoting postoperative healing in orthopaedic surgeries, focusing on wound healing outcomes, pain levels, patient satisfaction, and complication rates.

Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study included 100 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgeries. Participants were randomly divided into the PRP group (n=50) and the SWC group (n=50). PRP was prepared using a double-spin centrifugation technique and applied intraoperatively and during postoperative dressing changes on days 1, 3, and 7. Wound healing was assessed using the Southampton Wound Assessment Scale (SWAS) on days 7, 14, and 28. Pain levels (VAS), patient satisfaction scores, and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Data were analyzed using t-tests and chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: The PRP group showed significantly better wound healing outcomes, with lower SWAS scores on day 28 (0.8 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Pain levels were consistently lower in the PRP group, with a mean VAS score of 1.1 ± 0.5 compared to 2.7 ± 0.9 in the SWC group (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the PRP group (8.9 ± 1.2 vs. 7.1 ± 1.5; p < 0.001). Complications, including wound infections (4% vs. 16%; p = 0.04) and delayed healing (6% vs. 18%; p = 0.04), were less frequent in the PRP group. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed PRP as an independent predictor of improved wound healing outcomes (β = -0.65, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: PRP significantly improves postoperative wound healing, reduces pain, increases patient satisfaction, and lowers complication rates compared to standard wound care. These findings support the use of PRP as a valuable adjunct in orthopaedic postoperative management.

 

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessment of cardiovascular disease risk in schizophrenia patients
Published: 27/05/2019
Research Article
Susceptibility and Risk Factors of developing type 2 Diabetes and Pre- diabetes among Young Indian Population in Uttarakhand, India
...
Published: 28/03/2023
Research Article
Comparative study of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with remifentanil for epidural anesthesia and analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery
Published: 28/01/2025
Review Article
Relationship between Anti-TPO Antibodies and Thyroid Dysfunction: Cases of Various Thyroid Disorders.
...
Published: 28/03/2023
© Copyright CPD Bulletin Clinical Biochemistry